![]() confined to bibliographic references, glossaries, and other scholarly apparatus. Example: Bring any two items however, sleeping bags and tents are in short supply. It is also preferable to use a comma after these words and terms. For example, the Chicago Manual of Style (16th ed) recommends that they be ". Use a semicolon before such words and terms as namely, however, therefore, that is, i.e., for example, e.g., for instance, etc., when they introduce a complete sentence. Because of that, the most current guidance I have read is to avoid the abbreviations. This research aims to determine the factors driving acceptance of these applications, with acceptance represented by three distinct variables, namely usage intentions, willingness to disclose personal data, and willingness to rely on health advice. I've had numerous college professors and known numerous physicians who incorrectly use "i.e." when they mean "for example." I've even seen professionally published, peer-reviewed, scholarly journal articles use i.e. It seems the vast majority of native English speakers have never bothered to crack a dictionary to look these up. The original post asked "Do you think native English speakers would find it weird or inappropriate?" Unfortunately yes. We also included an open-ended section in the survey instrument for respondents to offer qualitative suggestions to the host institution. is rephrasing specifically in the style of an extensional definition. Five aspects of peer learning were explored, namely usage rate, current practices, outcomes, challenges, and coping strategies. is not particularly subtle, but still confused. where you are rephrasing something, but the manner of rephrasing is to list items by name "We accept all major credit cards viz., Visa and MasterCard." is Latin for videlicet, and it means "namely." It is really a sub-type of i.e. If I state, "We accept all major credit cards i.e., Visa and MasterCard," that indicates that that I'm defining "all major credits cards" as just Visa and MasterCard, and those are the only two that I accept. is Latin for id est, and it's used to mean "that is." And "that is" is used to indicate a rephrasing. is Latin for exempi gratia, and it's used to mean "for example." If I state that "we accept all major credit cards e.g., Visa and MasterCard," that means that we accept Visa and MasterCard, as well as other, un-named credit cards that would also be considered "major." (In this case, the phrasing is ambiguous since customers won't know what other credit cards are considered "major.") I'm hoping a compare and contrast may be helpful to future readers that arrive here as I did (internet search).Į.g. But I'm adding a compare and contrast to e.g. The question already has a great answer that I can't improve on.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |